|
Role of the QCA
The
QCA is an independent body that provides regulatory oversight of
GAWB’s pricing practices at the direction of the QCA Ministers.
Its primary role is to ensure that GAWB’s:
-
expenditure is appropriate and
efficient
-
prices are competitive and reflective
of national competition policy
-
customers are not disadvantaged through
GAWB charging monopoly profits and
-
revenue
is sufficient to provide for a sustainable business.
Regulatory Review Process
GAWB has an open and transparent
relationship with its customers and the QCA – an important
aspect of the price review process. This process involves:
-
GAWB
makes submissions to the QCA
-
Stakeholders (e.g. customers, government and members of
the public) provide comment on GAWB’s proposals
-
QCA
issues a draft report for comment
-
QCA
issues a final report
Submissions to the QCA
GAWB has made three submissions to the QCA
for the 2010 price review comprising:
Submission 1 –
Commercial Framework and
Pricing Principles for the 2010 price review (September 2009).
This submission contains GAWB’s proposals for
changes to the current pricing principles and practices. It was
available for public review and comment.
Submission 2 –
Expenditure Proposals
for the 2010 price review (December 2009).
This submission contains details and justification of GAWB’s
necessary operating expenditure levels, proposed capital
expenditure, forecast customer demand and regulated asset base.
The Expenditure Proposals
submission was also made available for public review and
comment. Some reports were provided to the QCA confidentially as
they contained commercially sensitive information such as
individual customer demand forecasts.
Submission 3 – Pricing
Model (December 2009). GAWB’s pricing model is used to
generate customer prices based on the inputs and methodology
contained in its earlier submissions. This submission is
confidential as it contains individual customer pricing and
consumption details.
Stakeholder comments
Stakeholders have had the
opportunity to comment on GAWB’s public submissions. GAWB has
also provided a response to stakeholder comments on the
Commercial Framework and Pricing Principles submission and
Expenditure Proposals submission.
These comments can be found on the
QCA’s
website.
Draft report
The QCA released its draft report on
12 April 2010. The draft
report provides comments on GAWB’s proposals, stakeholder
feedback and makes draft recommendations. All stakeholders,
including GAWB, had the opportunity to comment and provide
feedback on the draft report.
The draft report and GAWB's response to the draft report can be found on the
QCA’s website.
Final report
The QCA issued its final report by 2 July 2010
after considering
feedback and comments received on the draft report. The final
report recommendations will be provided to the QCA Ministers for
review and approval or disapproval. If accepted, the
recommendations will be given effect by GAWB in pricing
practices from 1 July 2010.
Price Impacts
The QCA's final
recommendations will result in an increase of the bulk water
price. To be sustainable, GAWB's prices must be raised to
reflect the increase cost of supplying water, in line with the
recommendations made by the QCA. Based on average
household consumption, the increase in the bulk water price
would equate to approximately $174 per year.
The QCA in its final report
has attributed the increase to the following factors:

There are many variables that will impact price
however the following four factors will have the greatest
influence.
Increase in cost of
capital (or regulatory rate of return) – GAWB’s
regulatory rate of return is factored into prices through the
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). The WACC is used to
measure the appropriate return on GAWB’s assets that an investor
should expect.
The 2010 price review has come at a time when the cost of
corporate debt is significantly higher than when previous
reviews were conducted due to the impact of the global financial
crisis. While this is only one component of the WACC, the significant increase in the cost
of corporate debt has had an upward effect on the regulatory
rate of return to be recovered in prices.
The following figure
illustrates the significantly higher borrowing margin payable by GAWB
at the 2010 price review, as a
notional BBB rated entity, over the cost of Government debt.

Source -
http://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/interest-rates-australia.pdf
Lower demand – Customers have enjoyed lower prices in the
2005-2010 regulatory period due to the forecast demand
determined at the 2005 price review being higher than what was
actually achieved. Forecast demand from new projects including
planned expansions did not eventuate. Demand forecasts are reset at the 2010
price review.
Increase in capital expenditure –
During the 2005-2010 regulatory period GAWB incurred a
significant amount of essential capital expenditure that is now
included for pricing purposes. The QCA has also approved
$53M of capital expenditure for the 2010-2015 regulatory period.
Increase in operating and maintenance
costs
– As detailed in GAWB’s Expenditure Proposals submission, the allowance
approved by the QCA at the 2005 price review was not sufficient
to allow GAWB to meet all of its regulatory, customer and asset
obligations. However ,GAWB has undertaken all necessary
work to ensure these obligations were met and customers were
provided with a safe and secure water supply. The QCA in
its final report has allowed a significant increase in the
forecast operating expenditure allowance after carefully
scrutinising and considering the necessary expenditure required
by GAWB to carry out its functions as a essential service
provider.
The appropriateness of GAWB’s forecasts have been demonstrated
by external benchmarking against other comparative bulk water
organisations, expert analysis on the adequacy of GAWB’s
resourcing requirements, and other specialist consultant
reports. View a copy of the
benchmarking report.
How
does GAWB’s water price compare with other regions?
While water is still a
relatively inexpensive resource, there have been some
significant price increases in recent years. An example of such
an increase is the recent decision by the Essential Service
Commission (ESC) of Victoria to approve an increase of 76% to
89% in bulk water charges by Melbourne Water to its retail water
distribution customers.
Read a copy of the report.
To assist GAWB in understanding prices for
water in other regions in Australia, GAWB engaged Synergies
Economic Consulting (Synergies) to prepare a report compiling
water prices across Australia.
Read
a copy of the report.
|